Reviewed July
2000
I
saw my first no-holds-barred video a couple of years ago, it was the Ultimate
Fighting Championship 3. On the cover Royce Gracie, two-times champion, and Ken
Shamrock, who had lost to Gracie in the first UFC, were facing off. Shamrock only
had two fights, and beat Christophe Leninger and Felix Lee Mitchell. Although
he didnāt get a chance to face Gracie, as the promoters had hoped (both pulled
out), both his awesome physique and obvious power impressed me, and he and Gracie
were the two main influences on my decision to take up martial arts. I recently
finally got round to reading Shamrockās book.
The
first part ( Enter the Lion: The Story of a Modern Gladiatorā) is a biography
by Richard Hanner, a local journalist assigned to do an article on Shamrock (born
Kilpatrick). In his own words, the story turned out to be no routine assignment,
as Hanner decided to extend a short article to an entire biography on Shamrock.
It
has a lot of chapters ,15 , and despite initial confusion, and the appearance
of having no coherent structure or chronology, on further reading the construction
is actually very good. Sometimes alternating chapters, sometimes alternating within
chapters, Hanner combines the story of Shamrock growing up with his career as
a martial artist. For example, the first chapter starts with the beginning of
Shamrock's final appearance to date in the UFC, and finishes with some background
and history to no-holds-barred fighting. The next chapter expands on this, while
simultaneously touching on Shamrock's training and the Lionās Den. Then Hanner
talks about Shamrockās early childhood in chapter three and how he was kicked
out of his house by his step-father, before giving a greater insight to the training
requirements of the Lionās Den in chapter four. And so on. It sounds messy but
works well.
Hanner
also gives a background to the UFC, a good idea considering its groundbreaking
nature, as well as talking about all the legal problems that it has faced. He
talks about how Art Davie, Robert Meyrowitz and Rorion Gracie got together; he
also gives a little background on the Gracie family also apt, considering the
rivalry between the Gracies and Shamrock. He tells the story of the appearance
on Larry King Live of Shamrock, John McCain, and Meyrowitz, and gives some clear
arguments for the safety of the UFC.
He
continues with Shamrockās career, talking about other Lionās Den fighters such
as Jerry Bohlander, right up to the night of his Superfight against Dan The Beastā
Severn. He talks about Bob Shamrock and his role in adopting and bringing up Shamrock.
He had housed several hundred delinquents before Shamrock, and tells a story about
how he floored Shamrock for breaking the house rules. He certainly comes across
as a very positive influence on Shamrockās life, as has Tina, Shamrockās wife.
A lot of the book is also about how Shamrock has grown from the street brawler
he used to be to a responsible father. Indeed, at some points it is positively
touching; "At one of the boyās birthday parties, we all had those goofy,
pointy hats", Tina recalls, "At the end of the party, there was only
one person, adult or child, who was still wearing his funny little hat. That was
Ken" . The thought of one of the worldās most dangerous men sitting at a
table with children and looking goofy to please them is a genuinely touching thought.
There
are other points in the book that show Shamrockās good fatherhood too such as
when he has to leave an interview so as not to be late for T-ball coaching his
sonās team. All this has to be considered with the following in mind, however;
the book is totally biased.
There is not one point in it that is remotely critical of Shamrock. When he loses
to Gracie in UFC 1, it was because he had never fought anyone wearing a gi before,
and even though the referee didnāt see the tap-out, Shamrock was an upstanding
man and admitted that he had lost. In UFC 5, his draw with Gracie would have been
a win if there had been judges. Same with Oleg Taktarov. When he loses to Severn
in UFC 9 Severn cheats. I am also dubious about other bits Hanner claims that
Shamrock can lift 600 pounds over his chest but that is more that the world powerlifting
record! But all that is to be expected.
The
first half of the book isnāt a difficult read by any standards, but it is clear
and easy to get through. I certainly enjoyed it, but I was a fan; an anti-Shamrock
man would probably hate it. Some parts have become a bit of an in-joke with other
friends of mine that have read it. As a demonstration of how Shamrock as matured
from a bar brawler Hanner tells an incident where a big street-fighter tried to
start a fight with him in a bar. Shamrock walks away. It would be so easy, so
satisfying, to allow the man to swing, and then to crush him. Hanner says. Crushing
someone is now a regular part of my vocabulary. Hanner constantly talks about
Shamrockās maturity, and how he has ,conquered his rage, his family now comes
first, and a broken hand could put him out of the next fight, could cost him dearly,
his family dearly. it all sounds very sensationalised, but comes across as being
valid; one gets the impression that if Hanner hadnāt made it sound like an intro
to a film trailer it would have been a lot more viable. The first part of the
book, then, has to be taken with a pinch of salt, and is an easy and unchallenging
book. What I liked about it was that I could pick it up and read any chapter at
any time. It sounds like a clich, but parts are genuinely inspirational, and
it makes you realise that if he can achieve so much from such a tough background,
surely thereās no excuse for anyone else.
The
second partŹ -Inside the Lion's Den: The Secrets of Submission Fightingā - is
by Shamrock himself, about his training regime in the Lionās Den. Here there are
some inspirational bits, but one wonders if he hasnāt toned it down for the majority
of readers; his target of 500 squats I found easy after only a couple of weeks
of going for it, and I am hardly a professional fighter. Similarly, 100 push-ups
and 100 crunches isnāt really that hard, not if you are training professionally
in a dojo all day every day. Shamrock also seems to repeat now-refuted myths;
that doing 200 crunches a day will lead to the fat around the stomach going; this
idea of , spot-reduction has long been rejected. But the chapter on conditioning
still inspires me to go and train.
The
second part is an enjoyable read. More evidence of his being targeted at an audience
not already schooled in martial arts is in the moves that he shows ö there is
little in the way of holds, chokes and armlocks that I hadnāt learnt within my
first month of judo. There are some gems, though; I like the chapter on agility
drills, and I havenāt seen the crucifix hold before.
The
final chapter on psychological preparation for a fight is also very useful. I
also like the way that Shamrock refers to his fights for demonstrations of certain
moves ö the heel hook and Pat Smith in UFC 1, for example (Pat Smith gets a rough
ride throughout the whole book ö deservedly so from his behaviour when he fought
Shamrock; Dan Severn doesnāt fare much better!).
My
overall judgement of the book; is it well written? Not really. Is a good book?
Yes. Was it worth the price? Yes. Did I learn much? No. So why is it good? I donāt
know. If it is a casual read that you want, and you are a fan of Shamrock, buy
it. Donāt buy it if you want to learn how to fight; there are hundreds of books
out there to show you much better. Do buy it if you want to see how a champion
fights; I did, and I enjoyed it (although, as I said, I think it might have been
toned down for his WWF audience). Out of ten?
Seven or Eight. Ollie